Neue Studie sieht Vorteile von Schach in jüngeren Klassen

Die vorläufigen Ergebnisse einer mehrjährigen Studie im Bundesstaat Alabama scheinen darauf hinzudeuten, dass Schachunterricht die Leistung der Schüler verbessern kann, insbesondere bei jüngeren Schülern. Die Studie, die von Forschern der Tennessee Tech und der University of Alabama in Zusammenarbeit mit Alabama Chess in Schools durchgeführt wurde, veröffentlichte ihre Ergebnisse im vergangenen Monat.

Während zahlreiche Forschungsstudien mit Schach und Kindern durchgeführt wurden, ist dies die erste strenge Längsschnittstudie in den USA seit einiger Zeit. Die Forschung zeigte zwar einen deutlich kleineren Effekt von Schach und Argumentation in der Mittelstufe, scheint jedoch eine positivere Korrelation zu zeigen als andere neuere Studien.

Full disclosure: ChessKid.com was used by the program's leaders and teachers and the data derived was incorporated into the study, although neither Chess.com nor ChessKid.com staff contributed in any way to the actual research or the writing of the report. The report concluded that 79 percent of the teachers involved in the study used ChessKid.com in some capacity.

The research only focused on years 1-3 of what will eventually become a five-year project. Most of the data comes from the first two years, where nearly 800 kids were taught chess for a minimum of 1-2 hours weekly (more than 90 percent of classroom teachers reported using ChessKid.com in their instruction). In addition, about 400 kids were in a control group and were not given chess instruction.

The study goes on to show data in a variety of areas, including critical thinking, a "21st Century Skills" evaluation, a teacher survey, and a student survey.

The so-called "Cornell Critical Thinking Test" was given to both the chess and control groups at the beginning and end of the year. The test measures five areas: induction, observation, credibility, deduction, and assumptions.

Year one was much more positive for fans of chess education. Of the five grades for which there is data, all but one showed better scores for the chess (intervention) group for "induction." Year two was more mixed, but again the youngest grade (4) showed better scores, as did grades 8 and 9.

For observation and credibility, chess gave more of a clear bump to younger children. Grades 4-6 chess students did better in both of the first two years of the study, while only in the second year of the study did the eldest students perform better after chess education. Those same findings closely parallel how students performed in the deductive reasoning section and also the assumptions section.

Overall, clearly the youngest kids in the study in grades 4-6 showed the most to gain from chess education. This was again seen when testing for "deduction" as the noticeable gains in the elementary school years mostly tapered off by middle school, but then reappeared in 10th grade.

For the "21st Century Skills" measurement, when comparisons with a control group were possible, the study reported that "students exposed to chess were, on average, consistently rated by their teachers as having made improvements." The skills being measured by teachers via a pre-test and post-test were: academic achievement, effective decision and judgement processes, critical thinking, strategic thinking, problem solving, systems thinking, cross-disciplinary thinking, and overall engagement.

Numerous more charts for this octet of constructs is available in the full report.

The study concludes with a teacher survey and a student survey. Teachers had various levels of experience playing and teaching the game. Some taught during school, while others did so after school. Overall, 40 percent of teachers taught chess during math time. As you can see in the chart below, the results were mixed on how easy this was, but a sizable majority reported that the effort was worth it:

Other figures bolstering the argument for chess education: 81 percent of teachers thought chess helped their students socially and 73 percent thought the game helped academically. Chess suffers from a labor shortage, but importantly more than seven out of 10 teachers said they enjoyed mixing their teaching with chess.

But the game is not a panacea: You still can't get kids to enjoy that annoying schoolwork:

The teacher survey concluded:

"Not only did chess appear to benefit the students, but it also seemed to help the teachers. They shared their their classes flowed more smoothly and that students were more receptive to their pedagogy. Though we were not aware of any other chess tools teachers may have used, ChessKid.com appeared to be a preferred way for teachers to implement chess into their lessons, with only a small number of teachers (7 percent) indicating a preference for not using this website. Overall, these factors indicate chess as an instructional strategy provided a positive and meaningful education experience for students and teachers."